how rankings are determined....

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Jan 08, 2006 Posts: 480

Just wanna say you guys are doing a great job.
But i didnt see my name though. Am i retired?

**Donate Points** · Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:20 pm

Not at all Turk! You're still in the amateurs (scroll down a bit on the rankings page), and once a fighter gets more than 9 wins, he'll advance to the pros. A good week this week and you could be there easy Smile

**Donate Points** · Professional Joined: May 12, 2005 Posts: 150

Keep up the good work Blake.I think the system is perfect just the way it is. Very Happy

FALCyou wrote:

Hey man...i gotta say too, rankings should be rankings. Not based just 1-10 in the exact order of # of wins.

A guy like tysonfanatic who is 25-3 should no way be ranked under a 34-17 guy. just my opinion.....

**Donate Points** · Training Joined: Sep 13, 2006 Posts: 13

I like the idea of *must pick fights

doesn't neccesarily have to be EVERY fight each week, but fights you deem *must pick means they need to be included int hat weeks picks for your submission to be valid.

if there are 7 fights and you pick 4 as *MP , then you get nobody picking the 2 easy fights and nothing else.

That should solve this all. Then the ratings should be based on the commis's professional judgment, not # of wins.

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1734

FALCyou wrote:

I like the idea of *must pick fights

doesn't neccesarily have to be EVERY fight each week, but fights you deem *must pick means they need to be included int hat weeks picks for your submission to be valid.

if there are 7 fights and you pick 4 as *MP , then you get nobody picking the 2 easy fights and nothing else.

That should solve this all. Then the ratings should be based on the commis's professional judgment, not # of wins.

Yeah then Tysonfantic can get his act back to together