Boxrec.com all time rankings

**Donate Points** · Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 9:20 pm

These rankings are so bad that they might be changed. These rankings rank every boxer that fought in the heavyweight divsion. This is what *Censor* me off. Tyson and Holyfield were not in the top 200! i gave up looking for them. Like what the *Censor* and yougest champ ever and the only 4 time champ could not be found. BUSTER was 14! Mikeal Mooer was 20! Jack Dempsey was like 84! Jack Johnson was like 90! what *Censor* is up with these rankings. If these rankings change or if you fing Tyson/Holyfield post back. Oh Ray Mercer was 40 and he won the WBO once and he never beat anyone good.

**Donate Points** · Amateur Joined: May 23, 2005 Posts: 51

i like tyson too but he didnt do enough to get into the top 200. if you dont like the rankings then dont look at them.

**Donate Points** · Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 9:43 pm

Hey bubby Tyson should be in the top 50! Now i know that active boxers are not on the list. so that is why tyson and holyfield are not on the list. but when ruddock,buster,mooer, mercer are on the list then tyson should be. you are dumbest person in the world tyson was the youngest champ ever he beat a guy in 90 sec Spinks and spinks beat homles twice. Leon Spinks as like 80. so SHUT UP

**Donate Points** · Amateur Joined: May 23, 2005 Posts: 51

who in the *Censor* are you talking to. go suck your moms *Censor* you retard. beating two washed up champions and always getting kod by real competition makes tyson a good fighter. but no a great one. when you learn what it takes for a boxer to be great then you can reply to me. but until then go *Censor* your stupid ass self.

**Donate Points** · Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 8:22 am

Personality #1:

Marchigiano wrote:

who in the *Censor* are you talking to. go suck your moms *Censor* you retard. beating two washed up champions and always getting kod by real competition makes tyson a good fighter. but no a great one. when you learn what it takes for a boxer to be great then you can reply to me. but until then go *Censor* your stupid ass self.

Personality #2:

Marchigiano wrote:

they arent wild they have their own opinions...

http://www.tysontalk.com/ftopic-468-30.html

Until you realize medication is your friend and curb your self-contradictions, your own insane opinions are hereby void. Amigo.

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 681

you guyz need to chill out! i personally feel tht mike iz underated az a fighter but thts my opinion.

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1735

Spencer_Boxing wrote:

These rankings are so bad that they might be changed. These rankings rank every boxer that fought in the heavyweight divsion. This is what *Censor* me off. Tyson and Holyfield were not in the top 200! i gave up looking for them. Like what the *Censor* and yougest champ ever and the only 4 time champ could not be found. BUSTER was 14! Mikeal Mooer was 20! Jack Dempsey was like 84! Jack Johnson was like 90! what *Censor* is up with these rankings. If these rankings change or if you fing Tyson/Holyfield post back. Oh Ray Mercer was 40 and he won the WBO once and he never beat anyone good.

oi spencer can u give me a direct link to the rankings pleas

**Donate Points** · Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 10:32 am

Heres a link tysoncrazy50:

http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1735

yeh some guy called ingemar johansson is rated *Censor* 7 oh my god ur rite even bruce seldon is in the top 100 lol

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1735

and they rated floypatterson 3rd tyson was 10 times of better than liston liston got ko in 1 round in the rematch against muhammad ali... these boxrec guys are crazy the only thing they could right was putting muhammad ali first and thank god they done that Very Happy

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Jan 24, 2005 Posts: 390

Why wouldn't you rate Jimmy Bivvins ahead of Joe Louis? Shocked

**Donate Points** · Amateur Joined: May 23, 2005 Posts: 51

tysoncrazy50 wrote:

yeh some guy called ingemar johansson is rated *Censor* 7 oh my god ur rite even bruce seldon is in the top 100 lol

you dont know who ingemar johansson is? lol not a surprisze you have to be older than 13 to know him. he beat floyd patterson by ko to win the title. go learn something and come back you piece of sh1t

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1735

Marchigiano wrote:

tysoncrazy50 wrote:

yeh some guy called ingemar johansson is rated *Censor* 7 oh my god ur rite even bruce seldon is in the top 100 lol

you dont know who ingemar johansson is? lol not a surprisze you have to be older than 13 to know him. he beat floyd patterson by ko to win the title. go learn something and come back you piece of sh1t

um yeh lol funny so wot happened in the rematch Rolling Eyes

so i doo now my boxing u sh1t head

**Donate Points** · Amateur Joined: May 23, 2005 Posts: 51

tysoncrazy50 wrote:

Marchigiano wrote:

tysoncrazy50 wrote:

yeh some guy called ingemar johansson is rated *Censor* 7 oh my god ur rite even bruce seldon is in the top 100 lol

you dont know who ingemar johansson is? lol not a surprisze you have to be older than 13 to know him. he beat floyd patterson by ko to win the title. go learn something and come back you piece of sh1t

um yeh lol funny so wot happened in the rematch Rolling Eyes

so i doo now my boxing u sh1t head

no why dont you tell us what happened. youre the one who doesnt know who ingo is.

**Donate Points** · World Champion Joined: Oct 28, 2004 Posts: 1735

oi u *Censor* fool im takin the *Censor* out of bout the rematch HE OVSILY GOT KO BACK By paterson DURHHHHH..... U R *Censor* dum retard *Censor*